Search Smart Spending:

Behind the 'We Deserve It Dividend' hoopla

Posted Sep 25 2008, 02:47 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

The Internet is afire with a grand proposal. Instead of bailing out AIG to the tune of $85 billion, why not divide the money among all 200 million or so U.S. adults?

That gives $425,000 to every woman and man, the widely circulated e-mail says, or $297,500 after taxes. Wow.

This idea has gotten a lot of traction online, particularly as Congress is now considering a $700 billion bailout or rescue or whatever for America's financial institutions.

"Sounds like a plan," exclaimed Cathy at Cathy's Blog -- For Me For Once, one of many bloggers who've passed the $85 billion "We Deserve It Dividend" proposal on.

There's only one small problem with this plan.

"It only works out to $425 per person," an anonymous reader of Cathy's Blog wrote. "Whoever is circulating that idea is an idiot. Don't believe everything you read." And how.

But the WDID plan -- claimed by so many people as their own that it's impossible for us to know who hatched it (and forgot to double check the math) -- does suggest good uses for a huge chunk of cash if it were to fall into consumers' hands -- like paying off personal debt, spending it for college and investing it.

In fact, a Forbes.com article at MSN Money spells out other possible uses for the $700 billion contained in the latest bailout proposal:

    • The nation's bridges need $180 billion in repairs.

    • Rail infrastructure needs $185 billion in maintenance.

    • $150 billion would provide every American with private health insurance, and also pay for a universal automated health-information system.

    • The government could pay off the $500 billion cost of the war in Iraq. "Unlike investments in distressed assets, paying for the Iraq war won't produce a return, but $700 billion would stem the government's future debt obligations to its creditors," the article says.

    The author of the original WDID e-mail also tapped into people's unhappiness with bailouts like the ones for AIG (actually a federal loan), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the $700 billion granddaddy of all deals being negotiated as we write. One of the things people wonder is how we're all going to pay for it.

    "Yes, he did his math wrong. It actually works out to $425 per person," wrote "spectral44." "Better than the stick in the eye we're about to get, eh?"

    Comments

     

    Did anyone else hear that noise? CRASH! Like sooo many people on this blog stated the buyout didn't do any good, once again the government has taken 700 billion dollars and spent it on who? Not the people who needed it. What a freaking waste!

    700 billion should be considered an investment and not spending which is what is getting a lot of thought. Spend spend spend..... Just like health care... throw some money at it and it fixes the problem.........imagine the problems if we threw $400,000 at every citizen in this country...if you cannot it would be a bad thing.

    If you're running a business on credit and need that market to thaw to survive then you have no business running a business. The U.S. Constitution makes absolutely no provision for procurement and redistribution of wealth. But hey if you think an uneducated individual pushing a button on an assembly line is worth $26/hr, then you probably agree that the law of the land can be ignored in time of "crises". By the way how does AIG, Stearns, or any other financial conglomerate affect the person making a living with the sweat of their back, strength of their hands, and the sharpness of their mind? It doesn't. If your lifestyle is dependent on saving the jobs and lifestyles of others and you are entirely fearful that you may be held only to the standard of your own ability then you have not only mortgaged your home but your life. Good luck paying that debt.

    A working small business man in United State. It was a good place to be about five years ago. Now that the big corporations let themselves get into financial problems and it has hurt all of the so called little man. I think personally that the government should not bailout AIG. Because if I would let my company get that far in over its head, I would have to close up shop no questions ask except for the bank demanding their money. The government can only see the big companies because they have more effect on capitol status of the United States  but what they don't realize is without the small business the big company's can not survive. but it would not be smart to give the money to the citzens because it would be approx. 425 dollars a person

    Send a Comment

    Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

    (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):