Search Smart Spending:

Taxpayers to the rescue: PF bloggers sound off

Posted Sep 22 2008, 04:02 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

Are you outraged about the $700 billion bailout plan for Wall Street, relieved that the government's offering financial markets a helping hand, or sitting back until the dust clears? You're bound to find some kindred souls in the personal-finance blogosphere.

First, we'll deal with the anger.

David at My Two Dollars is among those who are the most outraged. He writes, "If our government can afford (and us, in return -- without a choice, of course) $1 trillion to bail out companies that should be left to fall apart -- but we let poor kids suffer without an education or health care -- where are the priorities in this country?"

(To read more outrage and other sentiments, go to the MSN Money message boards by clicking here.)

Now for the middle ground: The bailout might not be fair to taxpayers, but it's probably necessary, writes Flexo at Consumerism Commentary. The new bailout "sends the message that corporations and homeowners are encouraged to lie, cheat and steal: Once the situation gets bad enough, all past sins will be forgiven," he writes. "Nevertheless, a bailout of this size is most likely necessary to help stabilize the economy, and without it, the world's economies might experience a devastating collapse in a manner never experienced before."

Will the plan work? It's too soon to tell. As an article at MSN Money says, "The plan could prove catastrophic for U.S. taxpayers in the worst case but could actually make money for the government if the housing market and the market for related securities begin to recover."

The question, writes economist Stephen Popick in a guest post at our partner blog Get Rich Slowly, is "Just what else is out there? And sadly, the answer is that we really don't know, because we don't have a handle on just who owns what debt in what financial instrument."

While we're waiting for the truth to emerge, let's not panic and stow our money in the mattress, many say. The advice from Sarah Winfrey at our partner blog Wise Bread is to hang in there because this will all eventually work itself out. "There will be a day, not too far away, when all of this dizzying up-and-down will be a distant memory," she writes.

Mr. ToughMoneyLove also offered some advice -- after blaming the government and business community for pushing homeownership as a goal, whether people could afford to buy houses or not. "Here's my suggestion,"  he said. "The next time the government or a stakeholder industry tells you that borrowing to purchase something is in the national interest, pay no attention."

Comments

 

I think the devil is in the details. If the goverment will pay like 25 cents on the dollar for this securites, it may even turn out a good deal for the goverment. Then they can un-bundle them modify the morgage terms and sell them back to the market, thus avoiding thousands of unnecessary foreclosures. Or just keep the mortgages and collect interest.

On the other hand if they pay 70 cents on the dollar that would be a big waste of taxpayers money.

The source of the problem can be traced back to Fannie and Freddie.  Why isn't anyone asking for a list of name of the members of congress that setup these organizations the way they did?

My satirical response to the Larry Kudlow meme that Democrats are to blame for the subprime crisis:

Feds, Economists blame Tim Johnson of Tupelo, Miss., for entire U.S. financial crisis

www.williamkwolfrum.com/.../feds-economists-blame-tim-johnson-of-tupelo-miss-for-entire-us-financial-crisis

Curt - cause then they would find McCain's Campaign Manager, who was paid $30K a month for 5 years, by FM&FM, for access to McCain to try to defend them against stricter regulations.  That is why no one is looking too deep.

http://tinyurl.com/3qyre2

Ayn Rand is probably rolling in her grave right about now. The spineless politicians  of this country have given in to the greed of corporate america. Why havent I heard either of the candidates (or any cowardly politician) about how we pay for this enormous early christmas gift to wall street? Does no one have the guts to look us in the eye and truthfully tell us who's going to pay for it? Will there be sacrifices (read: raising taxes) from the public? Will it be "charged" to "credit card" that the wars on terror have been (thanks "Bank of Republic of China")?

To be honest, I wish someone could say "none of the above" and tell me that the personal income taxes for the richest (and that would include all these greedy CEOs and CxOs) would be doubled or tripled as a condition for this bailout (in my head I'll call it retribution). Leave the sub 250,000/year families alone. This performance from these politicians has onl solidified my opinion of all politicians being snakes who only know who to lie and pander to public for their votes. How sad...to heck with them all

looking at these crooks Martha Serwart should be exhonerated

Better add Obama to your blog, David, as he has several of FM&FM former associates working on his campaign.  Remember, he also took the second highest campaign contribution from FM&FM. Also remember, Mc Cain warned about FM&FM two or more years ago and no one listened.  Keep your facts straight, then vote for your man, regardless of the facts.

None of us will know the real impact of this bailout for several years, but all of us should be concerned.

That's it I'm cashing out!!! Im not gambling anymore!

Lets take the buyout money and divide it over all of the taxpayers over 18.  By doing so, the public can use the money to pay off their homes, debts, etc.  The monies will end up going back to the lenders, government, etc. and will promote growth and spending.  Atleast by doing this the taxpayers will get something out of the deal except for the shaft!  We provide the money, the banking institutions make money off of OUR money.  Why should the taxpayer be penalized for poor business practices?  To reward those that have failed us is wrong.  Our nations priorities are not about doing whats right, its about immediate financial success and knowing whom to blame when the plan fails.

 Stupid  Is  as Stupid  Does ;  What about all the politicians whom said for years : DEREGULATE  THE  BANKING  SYSTEM :  Will they lose money or sleep over this.       LETS TAKE  MONEYS    OUT  OF  THE  POLITICIANS  RETIREMENT  SYSTEM   Its Fair GAME :  THE CROOKS  TOOK MY MONEY FROM SOCIAL SECURITY AND NEVER PAID IT BACK:         What about the Countrys that borrowed MONEY after WW1 &WW2  How much was paid back  What would the remainder be worth even with toays low INTEREST  rates     That Right There are two money OPTIONS.  How about we CHARGE IRAK or AFGANISTAN for OUR MILITARY PRESENCE: GOVERNMENT need not take anymore from the POOR TAXPAYERS like myself.  LOKK WITHIN GOVERNMENTS  Corruption  

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):