Search Smart Spending:

Honey, someone shrunk the roll of Bounty

Posted Jun 26 2008, 01:51 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

"LivingAlmostLarge" at the blog with the same name read an article about how manufacturers of food and sundry items are shrinking the size of their products and charging the same price. She found the proof in her own cupboards.

She wrote that "curiosity got the better of me and I started to pull through my cabinets.  And Bounty did decrease the roll size. I can say that because I have some from last summer." Bounty isn't the only product that's smaller now.

Our buddy Nickel at FiveCentNickel reported the same thing about ice cream: "I'm not sure if you've noticed, but over the past couple of years, 'half-gallon' ice cream containers have dropped from 2 quarts (an actual half-gallon) to 1.75 quarts to (most recently) 1.5 quarts. All without a price decrease."

According to an article in USA Today, that first drop in size happened five years ago. We didn't notice, and neither did LivingAlmostLarge and, we're sure, lots of other shoppers.

With companies dealing with higher energy and commodity prices, the article says, "Raising prices when strapped consumers are price-sensitive can be a formula for disaster. That's why there's often less in the box instead."

Other shrinking products include some brands of cereal, bar soap, snack foods and, yes, Bounty (a company spokeswoman said each sheet is now thicker and better). For more information about products that have been downsized, we recommend you read the entire USA Today story.

When consumers of Dreyer's ice cream complained, the company responded that it had to chose between a higher price -- $7 for a carton -- and a smaller container. Some unhappy customers will switch brands, but generally consumers prefer the latter, the article says. After all, how many people would pay $7 for ice cream?

We like LivingAlmostLarge's response: "I guess I'll be more aware now of the size of goods I am buying, even when on 'sale.'"

Comments

 

Inflation is a fact of life and although corporate greed is a problem, food companies are not really a good example of it. Besides, how much do you really need? If you don't notice, the smaller sizes will help our already obese and horribly wasteful society consume less.

i think i first noticed this as a kid with candy bars iam 52

The holes in saltine crackers are larger, too.  Cracker is the same size, but the hole is larger so there's less "cracker" in the cracker!

Look at Bacon and Sausage (16oz) NOT  now 12oz

Kimberly clark has reduced the width of it toilet paper by .25". This gave them a 10% increase in production with no added cost to the company. This is a LARGE savings for them that figures into the millions per year.

Weigh the paper towels on the produce scale, the heaver rolls have more towels.

Lets see you buy stock and want it to go higher, company wants it to go higher but risks the profit if it sells the stuff and a lower cost but cost now more to make (Shrinks the profit and lowers the stock) Doesn't anybody see how it really works. Its a vicious cycle and the middle to lower class are on the losing end. Great if you on top and the cost doesn't reflect, but you take advantage of the people. Democracy sure seems like dictatorship?

How about the concentrated dish liquid and laundry detergent.  give me a break, just a smaller bottle.

What happened to the 32 oz Mayo jars?

Some restaurants are also dishing up smaller portions. There used to be more for the doggie bags.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):