Search Smart Spending:

He doesn't feel sorry for Ed McMahon

Posted Jun 10 2008, 03:35 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

Sure, it's sad that TV icon Ed McMahon is facing foreclosure on his $6 million Beverly Hills mansion. But "PT" at Prime Time Money is irritated by the way McMahon has gone public with his housing woes. Ed has said he hopes his story will help others who are about to lose their homes.

"In my opinion, a millionaire, who could get any type of mortgage he wanted, has no business being the spokesperson for the foreclosure issues facing the few who really got duped," PT writes. "... I'm convinced he's simply hyping this to get the house sold."

PT does commend McMahon, just the latest celebrity in a foreclosure jam, for being upfront about why he's in this mess. Ed said on "Larry King Live," "If you spend more money than you make, you know what happens. You know, a couple of divorces thrown in, a few things like that."

His wife, Pamela, also was forthright, telling Larry King, "Over the years, it's a combination of maybe Ed working so hard and not looking at proper management. We didn't keep our eye on the ball. We made mistakes."

But Ed doesn't deserve to be the poster boy for the foreclosure era, PT says. "If I was someone really struggling with potential foreclosure, an adjustable-rate mortgage, and crooked lenders, I would be offended that Ed is comparing himself to me."

Of course, PT's readers shared their opinions about McMahon's troubles (as did readers of MSN Money). Ellen commented, "Ed McMahon was irresponsible, not ripped off and misled like thousands of lower-income families. Nevertheless, kicking an 85-year-old out of their home, regardless of the reasons, isn't something I would want to be responsible for."

Luke said, referring to Ed's role as presenter for the American Family Publishers sweepstakes, "He never brought a check to my house so I don't really care." "Mrs. PT" jumped into the mix with "Can't everybody just give the poor guy a break? He did, after all, bring us 'Star Search.'"

Comments

 

I do not feel sorry for him.  He had over 200 million dollars.  He has explained that his divorces cost him a lot.  He explained that he made some bad business decisions.  Nevertheless, he had 200 million dollars.  That's one fifth of a billion.  He doesn't have my sympathy at all.  He lost it all?  I don't feel sorry for him.  If he can't handle 200 million dollars, he deserves to land at rock bottom; live in modest means that he can handle, since he couldn't handle being ultra rich.  Rod Dagmar

I do remember American Family Publishers sweepstakes RIP-OFF a lot a eldely people who did not have any money to begin with. Mr McMahon was the front runner in the commercials. Yet we are suppose to feel sorry for him. I do not believe I have to say anything more.

In the comments section of another personal finance column someone couldn't understand how a couple that made nearly $200K/year could get into such deep financial trouble.  The Ed McMahon, Evander Holyfield and Jose Canseco stories should prove that having money doesn't make you any smarter.  

WHAT AN IDIOT!  NO MERCY FOR THE WEALTHY

While I feel some kind of bad for anyone losing their home, I find it hard to muster too much sympathy for someone who had more money than I will ever see in a lifetime.  Why wasn't his home already paid off?  And did an 85 year old man and his wife really NEED a $6 million home?  Does anyone?

Of course, I also find it hard to muster too much sympathy for those who borrowed more than they could afford in general and now expect a bail out.  I rented until I found a house with payments I could afford with a fixed-rate mortgage and I passed on all houses that would have required an ARM or fancy financing to make the payments fit my budget, why couldn't you?

The book proverbs, " The fool will be sperated from his money" as proven to be a true proverb.

Thank you Angel! I am a current renter with about a 10% down payment saved. I STILL don't feel comfortable buying a home as I want the payments to be budget friendly so losing my home would be, at the very least, an unforeseeable  issue. It's really hard to feel sorry for the guy who, if he lost his home would still be in a home I could only dream about being in. Hey, if I couldn't be in a 6 million dollar one, I guess I could settle for one in the $500,000 range...only if I had to of course. Sorry, no sympathy from me.

Per Ellen's comment in the story above, why feel bad about kicking him out of a house he can not afford? It isn't like he will be homeless. He will just have to rent like all the other people who are responsible with their finances and didn't gamble on a bailout.

So he'll be forced to move into a $10,000 a month apartment which is still much cheaper per month than his $6MM house. Boo hoo.

Poor Ed,

With all the more he made over the year he could have got some good advice from donald trump, robert t. kiyoski or any number of financial advisers. How about all that more the divorce cost hime hey ed ever heard of something called a prenup all the super rich have amny you needed to go to college and take a few courses in finacial responsiblity and not sapathy grow up and stoping blaming others for you mistakes sell the hous for 4 or 5 million or do a short sell break even called it a day move into a 1or 2 million dollar house and enjoy the rest of your days in bevery hills and stop complaining anout being rich.

The rich don't know how easy they have it! Time down size my mann!

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):