Search Smart Spending:

Buy one home and get a second one free

Posted Jun 03 2008, 08:48 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

The grocery shopper's beloved BOGO -- buy one, get one (free) -- has moved into the realm of home sales. Yes, home sales. In yet another sign of how anxious sellers have become in today's housing market, a San Diego real estate developer has offered a free $400,000 row home to anyone who buys one of his estate homes starting at $1.6 million.

"We want to reduce our inventory," Mark Connal, a vice president at Michael Crews Development, told the San Diego Union-Tribune. "We're prepared to bite the bullet. ... Right now, every builder I know is selling houses at less than it costs to build them."

Another company official, Dawn Berry, was quoted by a San Diego TV station: "We thought, 'Why does it just have to be on Pop-Tarts and restaurants? Why not buy one home, get one free.'" Of course, you'll have to pay property taxes on both.

The houses available for $1.6 million and up are gated estate homes in the San Pasqual Valley. The row homes, in Escondido, once sold for $540,000, according to the Union-Tribune.

A flier at the developer's Web site says, "It's never been done before and may never be done again!" The flier and a post at the company's blog say the offer was good through May 31.

A blog post at L.A. Land about the promotion generated plenty of comments. For instance, reader Greg said: "This is great! It will give me somewhere to park the free SUV I'll get with the purchase of my new hybrid." "steve in k.c." said: "May I default on the first one and then still keep the second one? Thanks in advance. Honey, get the kids, and load the van ... we're moving."

Comments

 

Just another opportunity to live the "guy dream".  One house for the family and kids, another place for the mistress!  Now Jude Law has a place to keep his nanny.

How about lowering your price by $400,000 or more to a more realistic price and maybe you can start selling properties..........

Well mia b, if they could sell the home for $1.6 then they wouldn't be giving the $400k one away, they would sell it too... business for profit... They are giving the home to a purchaser as an incentive to purchase the $1.6 because they need to reduce inventory to reduce the carring cost of interest, taxes, maintenance, etc. Those costs are bleeding their earnings and they want to cover their hard costs before it bankrupts them. On a total sale of $2M at $1.6 is only a 20% discount, they should cover their costs if it doesn't keep dragging on requiring more investment. This is a pretty common discount for home inventories across the country, just a different way of marketing. People are always looking for a deal and in this case if the purchaser doesn't want the investment and wishes to give it away he can, but in turn he would be paying a higher price for this home, which is why it's not selling in the first place. Someone could offer them $1.3 for just the one house and they'll probably take it.

how about you sell your house and buy one that costs half as much!? You could then buy one for someone else fallen on hard times. You are rich enough to do this -stop the greed! Funny how people like  you always have ways to spend others money . put your money where your mouth is or shut up .

You know there has to be a catch.  Bet the "row house"  looks like an old slave row

is there a management group that would manage the properties for out of state owners?

So what is the official sales cost of the free house?  If it's $0, that just further hurts the other owners in the subdivision driving their home value down and increasing the likelihood of short sales and foreclosures.  I like the donate it to a needy family idea.  Like Habitat for Humanity, then the company writes off the cost of the home and the home value isn't zero.

"If I were rich enough to do this I would for sure."  

If you own your own house, then you probably have enough money to give a few thousand to some family that is late on their payments...and I'm sure you haven't done that yet huh.  

Obviously it is because the $1.6 million house is not selling at that price. It's probably worth less than a million.  Some dummy with too much money will get stuck paying for a house they don't want/need.

It's just another gimmick. They are not selling these homes for less than they are making them. The $1.6 million home must be way overpriced.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):