Search Smart Spending:

Busting myths about better gas mileage

Posted May 23 2008, 05:12 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

Just when our brain was about to implode from reading the same 10 gas-saving tips at yet another blog, we found a different approach to the topic at Single Guy Money -- "6 gas-saving myths."

"SingleGuyMoney," with help from an article at CNN Money, debunks tips that have been repeated in e-mail and on Web sites to the point that people accept them as fact. We also checked some other sources. Let's start with that tip about filling your tank in the morning.

SingleGuyMoney writes, "According to Consumer Reports, the temperature of the gas as it comes out of the nozzle varies very little during the course of the day, so there is little benefit to waking up early to fill up the tank." We always love another reason to sleep in.

Replacing your air filter has no effect on gas mileage, he said. It's because our cars' computers adjust the gas-air mix when dirt and bugs clog the filter. However, a dirty filter will slow acceleration.

Premium fuel doesn't improve gas mileage, so don't use it unless your owner's manual says it's required.

While underinflated tires can reduce gas mileage, overinflating to further improve mileage can be hazardous. "The added risk of a crash isn't worth the extra mile a gallon you might gain," writes CNN Money's Peter Valdes-Dapena.

Air conditioning reduces gas mileage, but does that mean you should drive with the windows open? It's probably a good idea if you're in town and can stand the heat, but there's no clear answer for highway driving. Even with the additional drag, some vehicles  get better highway mileage with windows down than with A/C on. But, Phil Reed, consumer advice editor for Edmunds.com, told CNN Money, "It's hard to measure the difference, and every vehicle is different."

Consumer Reports had this to say after running a test with a Toyota Camry: "Using air conditioning while driving at 65 mph reduced the Camry's gas mileage by about 1 mpg. The effect of opening the windows at 65 mph was not even measurable."

Under the heading "Bolt-ons and pour-ins," Valdes-Dapena speculated that if there were attachments or gas additives that actually did increase gas mileage, the car and oil companies would be incorporating them into their products to outdo competitors.

If you want to read more on this topic, go to Edmunds.com's Green Car Guide and scroll down to "Improve your gas mileage." You'll find some great reads there.

Comments

 

So you guys have been telling us all these "tips" on the Smart Spending blog for 6 months and now all of a sudden those tips are all myths?  How do you know these new facts are even true?  

It's true that a dirty air filter (unless VERY DIRTY) will just be compensated for by the vehicle's computer, thus making little overall effect on fuel mileage. BUT, sooner or later, the computer will "know" that it is providing less fuel than it is programmed to under each operating condition and set the MIL light. That action will also cause it to make other adjustments that can affect fuel economy. More to the overall cost perspective, that will usually cause the consumer to visit a shop to find out why the "Check Engine Light" came on. This will probably result in a large repair bill because the diagnosis process may (likely) be done by someone who is either not capable of getting to the root cause of the "Check Engine Light" (ignorant) or will use that MIL to perform unneeded repairs (ripoff artist).

     In reality, all (manufaacturer) recommended services should be done in accordance with the schedule provided by the car maker to save money nnow and protect that huge investment you have made in the future. (BTW, it is NOT necessary to have them done by an "authorized dealer" - as long as the independant shop chosen is competent, of course, and use the proper coolant, oils and lubricants.)

First, lets all become a little smarter, fuel mileage is based on moving weight a certain distance with just 1 gal/lit of fuel.

So, if I have a 5000 lb. SUV and it gets 18 mpg, and you have a 2500 lb Hybrid and it gets 30 mpg. Who is driving the most fuel efficient vehicle?

Answer, SuV.

Hybrids, etc, are no more fuel efficient than any other vehicle. Generally more expensive to produce, have a greater cost to environment in long term.

All that lightweight plastic/composite is NOT going to decompose, at least for a few thousand years.

The best tips for improving fuel mileage is as always, make sure the engine is tuned correctly, tires are inflated to correct pressure, your driving is steady, not jumpy.

Have a good day.

The problem with your SUV/hybrid comparison, K, is that sure the SUV is doing a better job of hauling the weight but it is hauling 2500 lbs of unnecessary weight.  If you could have gotten yourself and all necessary items from point A to point B in the hybrid instead of the SUV and used 6 gallons of gas instead of 9 the hybrid is the better choice, no question.

frugalityonedayatatime.blogspot.com

LOL K, I am assuming you are jesting... in the same friendly spirit of bantor I 'one-up' you and propose we all switch to 18 wheelers, they can haul 40,000 lbs of material around while only consuming 6 mpg. Oh sure, there are difficulties, parking when you get to work, can't use the 'compact vehicle' parking space (what's up wiith that anyhow?), etc. But wow, talk about efficiency!

Hey man must be something wrong with your 18 wheeler only 6 mpg??? I get at least 9.5 mpg it is a 550 hp DAF thats a european truck and a cabover at that mind I only haul 48 tons tho but that is through the french alps and the spanish mountings

Well... an SUV doesn't need to weigh 5000pounds, neither does it have to get 18MPG. RAV4, CRV, hah ~ 4bangers. Obviously not made for hauling boats, but a V6 can do that job just fine. If we got rid of V8s I wonder how much fuel, $$$, and pollution we could save. Anyone with a calculator?

Over inflation of tire not only causes a reduction in safety of handling , but will cause abnormal wear just as under inflation does . The recommended tire pressure should be

adhered to . Always check the tire pressure before you've driven any great distance and

the temperature of the tires are normal . The air pressure will increase as they heat up from driving . Changes in the weather will also effect tire pressure .

There is a 30 year old , privately owned research and development company that in January brought to market technology comprised of old and proven components along with some new innovations . Phase #1 is a kit ( $995 ) that a mechanically inclined person can install themselves ( save $400 installation cost ) and then have one of the company's " Certified optimizer Tuning Technicians ( COTT ) " tune the mini-computer for $100 . Now , this sounds like a lot of money , but they " Guarantee " a 50% increase in fuel economy or your money back . They can do this because they are averaging 95% on the 1,000's

already installed .

Phase #2 is a replacement of the catalytic converter . This technology is awaiting EPA approval and expecting to be ready for market in August . Initial testing on a dynomometer on a 318 Chrysler engine , towing a trailer assimilating a 50% load , up a 30% grade at 3,000 RPM ( 65 MPH ) for one hour utilized 18 pounds of fuel before modification and 2 pounds of fuel after modification . That's taking 22 MPG to 196 MPG !!

The company began training automotive Engineers and Master mechanics on 06/25/2007 in their New Jersey facility to become " Instructors " . After a one week training course for phase #1 they returned to their home domain to begin training the local mechanic to become " Certified Installers " .

Sorry , but I don't think that I'm allowed to reveal the URL on this venue .

K.  Nice red herring, but you have bent the topic slightly here with a little sleight of hand.  I believe that you started with the following: "First, lets all become a little smarter, fuel MILEAGE is based on moving weight a certain distance with just 1 gal/lit of fuel."  Then you stated: "Who is driving the most fuel EFFICIENT vehicle?" and go on to speak about fuel EFFICIENCY.  I believe you actually defined FUEL EFFICIENCY not FUEL MILEAGE in your first statement.  Fuel Efficiency is what the railroads speak to in their ads on tv regarding the weight/distance/energy problem.  All fuel mileage speads to is the distance/energy problem.

James,

Sorry, total Scam!

Phase 1 - So they have all this proof, but will not reveal where to find the data proving it.  Really!

Phase 2 - How do you tow a trailer on a dynamomometer, and just how many pounds is a 50% load load equal to?  Using 6.1 lbs per gal. as an average weight of gasoline (on the low side, as sp. wt. can vary from 5.7 to 6.8), that means 2.95 gph for the first case, and 0.33 gph for the second case.  Or, 22.03 mpg vs 196.97mpg.  Sounds great, but totally removing the cat converter, as many have done in the past, just won't give anything like that.  Further, todays cat converters are much more efficient and present very little back pressure.  Finally, this device (or any catalytic convertor) placed downstream of the engine itself, has nothing to do with fuel ratios and combustion taking place in the engine upstream.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):