Search Smart Spending:

Food portions: A lot bigger than they used to be

Posted May 22 2008, 01:42 PM by Karen Datko
Rating:

Remember that old expression "My eyes are bigger than my stomach"? The fact is that if we see it, we'll eat it. Combine that with the fact that the size of pizza slices, burgers, bagels, soft drinks, movie popcorn and a lot of other foods has grown in the last 20 years, and you'll begin to understand why so many Americans are overweight. Even plates are bigger.

Seeing is believing, and pictorial proof of portion inflation can be found at Liz Monte's post, "Portion size, then and now," at Divine Caroline.

Two decades ago, two slices of pizza had 500 calories. Now, they're a lot bigger, with a robust 850 calories. "Those extra 350 calories, if eaten two times a month, would put on 2 extra pounds a year, or 40 pounds in the next two decades," Liz writes.

She compares the typical movie popcorn container of yesteryear (270 calories) with the tub lots of folks wolf down now (630 calories). Remember what we said about you'll eat it if you see it? Liz writes, "Studies indicate that when given food in larger containers, people will consume more."

Apparently, we don't even know we're overeating. Liz says today's bagel actually contains three servings of bread. Even when we're preparing our own food, we making it bigger. A serving of cereal at home is 20% larger than it was 20 years ago, she says.

Do we have the willpower to downsize our portions -- which would reduce our spending and our weight? A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute .pdf illustrates what normal portions look like, if we're interested. Liz adds, "It's unlikely that we'll see a scaling down of food to these sizes anytime soon, so perhaps we should all become familiar with another image: the doggy bag."

Comments

 

Just in the last few weeks, I've noticed something of a reversal--restaurants that are trying hard to hold the line on price increases have started downsizing portions.

I suspect that's just temporary, though.  The economics of the situation for restaurants is that ingredients are a modest part of their total costs.  If they can get you to pay a little more for bigger servings, they come out ahead, because their rent, utilities, and payroll don't go up with larger servings.

People eat more because there are chemicals purposely added to the food that cause addiction and obesity (not by restaurants but by the actual manufacturers of the ingredients).  About 90% of food items in the supermarket contain MSG and other harmful toxins but they're not listed on the label.  This practice of poisoning the food supply was started a few decades ago and is constantly increased.  That's why this obesity problem has recently escalated to the current level.  And it's not just obesity... it's also depression, ADHD, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, cancer, alzheimers... etc.  The only way to avoid these chemicals is to purchase organic foods or grow your own (and don't eat in restaurants unless they specifically serve organic foods).

Oh, please, Anne, that is such bunk.  All food additives that could cause a reaction of any kind and all others that are found at more than .5% of the total product must be labeled on packaging according to the FDA.  This includes everything from gluten and sodium to MSG.  Wikipedia will verify this if you search for MSG on their site.  Beyond that it doesn't benefit anyone to cause obesity, high cholesterol, etc. in the general public.  Killing off your customer base isn't a good way to make money.  Conspiracy theorists cause more harm than good.  Please check your facts with legitimate sources before spouting claptrap in public forums.

Out of curiosity, when did Wikipedia become a legitimate source??

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):