Search Smart Spending:

Report: Stay-at-home moms are worth 6 figures a year

Posted May 21 2008, 09:24 AM by Karen Datko
Rating:

Want proof that stay-at-home moms would be earning a pretty good income if they were getting paid for their work? A report by Salary.com says the time SAHMs spend on 10 "mom job functions" -- including housekeeper and psychologist -- would bring $116,805 in the work world.

Full-time moms work an incredible amount of overtime at their jobs -- 54.4 hours a week above and beyond the normal 40, the Web site says.

In contrast, working mothers spend 54.6 hours total a week on mom stuff, in addition to their paying jobs. Their mom pay would be $68,405, according to Salary.com's calculations.

Both income estimates are down from what Salary.com reported last year because of a change in how they were calculated.

How much is your mom time worth? "Bitsy Pieces" at Bits of Pieces advises that you can use a wizard at Salary.com to figure out what your salary would be, based on how many kids you have, where you live, and how much time you spend on individual mom job functions.

Of course, not everyone agrees that these estimates are valid, and with good reason. MSN Money's Liz Pulliam Weston, in an article several years ago, called such statistics "codswallop" (sending us scurrying to the dictionary to look that up).

David at My Two Dollars takes a different approach. "I would venture to say that you cannot even put a number on their worth," he says. "Sure, there are moms who don't do much of anything, but the majority of moms work incredibly hard at being a good mom -- and sometimes are not really recognized for their work."

Comments

 

These salary estimates are ridiculous. "Psychologist"? Please. Did the SAHMs go to college and study psychology and then pass licensing exams? No? Then they don't get to pretend they earn psychologist money.

In reality, to replace a SAHM, you'd have to hire a housekeeper at about $500/week. But that doesn't make for flashy headlines.

I agree with the last post.  Mom's CHOOSE TO STAY HOME WITH THEIR KIDS.  They don't get compensated and they'll never get compensated.  I'm 15 weeks pregnant right now.  I make $85,000 a year at my current job.  I'm taking a little time off and am considering hiring a full time nanny - which will cost about $30,000/year - but will actually condense my current cost for cleaning service at $150/week.  Not only that, the nanny can go grocery shopping, run errands, take care of the kid, AND clean the house.  I think a stay at home Mom is worth about $30,000 per year.  That's it.  Mom's are crazy if they think their work is equivalent to someone making $116000 per year.

Does this mean that those of us (Mothers) that work full-time and are able to take of the home as well as if not better than stay-at-home moms do we should make our salary plus $116,000.? I admire the SAHM for trying but really, what do they truly know. I also think it is humorous that they have no acknowledgment of Fathers. Yes, there are some great/good ones out there.

A housekeeper, PLEASE!!!!!  Obviously, you have never taken care of a child full time.  I do agree that the "psychologist" is a bit too much, but the "housekeepr" is way to little!!

Sigh.  This is the world we live in.  Being a mom was once considered to be the most rewarding thing a woman could do.  Now it's such a dreaded task that we must look for something--ANYTHING!--to build some artificial worth.

As a dad, I've wiped my kid's butts, potty trained them, fed them, and more.  I wonder what real-world jobs we can compare these activities to?  Specialized care for the infirmed or the paralyzed?  Maybe rehabilitation therapist?  I'm sure one butt wipe could have netted me at least 50 bucks!

I agree with Liz Pulliam who characterized such a study as codswallop!  I'd probably be better off actually knowing the word, but I'm too lazy to look it up.  But if I ever do, I'll charge my family the going rate of a Librarian or researcher.  I'll be rich someday.

SAHM are doing much more than $500/wk.  Try signing your real name next time...BOZO.

right ridiculous...show me a housekeeper that will be there at 6 am to get the kids up and ready for school, then clean the house, do the laundry, go grocery shopping, take care of paying bills set up doctors appointments switch over the insurance when needed or any othe type of household things that have to be done during working hours, then get the kids home, make sure homeowrk is done, kids get fed, then put them off to bed and clean up again...your obviously someone who lives alone with no wife or kids, I've done it before and I say the estimate is too low!!!  I'll take my 10 hour a day job anyday

$500 a week for a housekeeper? Sounds so harsh, yet for the services rendered probably closer to being accurate than 100k. However I imagine a mom's real worth is more likely to mirror the same value we place on a FT nanny, so maybe 25-35k a year?

Psychologist may be a bit over the top, however, $500 for a housekeeper is a low estimate.  We live in one of the cheapest places for daycare and I just quit my job after our 3rd child because daycare alone was going to exceed $650 a week.  Add housekeeping to child care and it goes up from there.  Plus, many moms have lots of additional roles in addition to housekeeping and childcare.  

What about moms who do all of the above and work a full time job...Are they worth even more?  The title of "psychologist" is something both parents took on when they took on the responsibility of being a parent.  Housekeeping, bills, and other responsibilities are something a single person without kids has to do as well (with no help from a spouse).

This article is very ridiculous.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):