Search Smart Spending:

The low-tech life is liberating (and cheap!)

Posted Apr 14 2008, 06:22 PM by Donna Freedman
Rating:

Tired of being a slave to your cell phone? Dump it. A pay-as-you-go cell may be your ticket to freedom, according to a reader who calls herself "Alexandrainabox."

"I relish my unreachability," she wrote in a Smart Spending message board thread called "Going low-tech is cheap and liberating."

Alexandrainabox, who writes a frugality blog called "Living Without Money," also sings the praises of low-tech entertainment: cooking at home, travel-trailer vacations, learning guitar from YouTube, and jamming with other musicians.

"All of this stuff is very low-end -- but it's so enjoyable. It's also very inexpensive. Kinda like the cashmere sweaters I buy at thrift stores for two bucks," she writes.

Low-tech, high satisfaction
Many people opt to have only cell phones instead of landlines. "SappyOmegaGuppy" is not one of them: "In my life there is no phone call so important that it can't wait until I get home. Having a cell phone is like wearing an electronic leash."

This reader says that cutting cable TV is "like getting an extra two to three hours of vacation each day, freeing time for books, friends, hobbies, community classes and, would you believe it, eight hours of sleep a night."

Others cite a mix of high- and low-tech pleasures. "PatrioticStablest" dumped the cells for prepaid phones and cut everything but 911 service on her landline. But she uses Skype to talk with her husband and son, who work overseas.

"Chrisfan1958" springs for satellite -- the only way to get TV in her rural area -- and Internet. Yet electronic entertainment takes a back seat to hiking, fishing, hunting, gardening, camping, rockhounding, and playing cards or board games. 

"We are low-tech and wouldn't change it," Chrisfan says.

You wanna talk low-tech? "Matts-dad" uses dial-up. It's not that slow, he says, and the price is right: $6.45 a month. He also loves camping, cookouts, guitar music and the occasional sweat lodge.

Many of his acquaintances feel "that you have to 'give up' money to get satisfaction" -- at a restaurant, theater, mall or wherever. Yet it seems "they really don't get satisfied. Hmm, I wonder why."

The lifestyle these readers enjoy is the kind that some folks have to go on vacation to experience. How many people do you know who escape to an island or a resort town to enjoy walking, fishing, riding a bicycle?

Living with less
I've got nothing against technology. I just don't want to keep upgrading, upgrading, upgrading. As an apartment-house manager I must have a cell, but mine is almost four years old and carries a bare-bones service plan.

My computer is more than three years old, and my printer is an old HP deskjet that a friend gave me several years ago. I used dial-up until last year, when I got Clearwire to ensure a connection that doesn't hang up on me (important when I'm trying to move homework into the online drop box).

I don't have a television because I have neither the time nor the inclination to watch. No video-game system, either. Well, I do have a Nintendo system that I won as a "Jeopardy!" contestant back in 1991. But it stays in the box -- no TV, remember?

I don't own a stereo, but I do have a $9.99-after-rebate boombox for the rare occasions when I want to listen to CDs. By my desk is another boombox that my sister ditched because its CD player is broken; I use it for the radio and it suits me fine.

In the mornings, I'm awakened by a clock radio that I bought for 99 cents at a thrift shop.

You know another thing I don't have? Credit card debt.

Texting vs. retirement
Some people get defensive when I write about living with less. It's as though I'm threatening to come to their homes and take away their big-screen televisions.

Look, it's your money. Spend it on video games and robot puppies if that's what you really want.

But try this, too: Add up what you've spent on technology -- cable, cell, online gaming, movie rentals, texting, etc. -- over the past six months. You might be surprised. You might be appalled.

If you have long-term financial goals like a house or an early retirement, think about what even half of that money might have done for your dreams.

And if you're currently having trouble making ends meet? Think about cutting back. It's easier to live without technology than groceries.

Comments

 

It all depends on the situation.  Sure, I believe in no cell phones because too many people are rude with them; and cable/satellite offer nothing truly worth watching.  However, some things are worth investing in, especially with the gas crisis.  

For example, I have a gaming system-- an Xbox 360.  It may be expensive, but for a total of around $500 or so (I bought mine close to when it came out, and the price includes stuff for a second player), I am able to make friends all over the world.  Better yet, I can play with the friends I graduated with who are four states away.  Sure, I could call them, but Xbox live allows me to play with 16-32 of them at once, all the while chatting.  It's definitely more fun to blow stuff up together.  I have even found new clients through this, as well as new friends from Australia.

So technology isn't all bad.  Oh, and I met my wife on the Internet 7 years ago.

ME! I HAVE BEEN A MINIMALIST FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND EVEN MORE YEARS. AND, I LOVE IT THAT WAY. NO TV. NO FANCY CAR. NO LIVING ROOM SET(MY LIVING ROOM IS MY DANCE FLOOR). SIMPLE CLOTHING AND SIMPLE AND NUTRITIOUS MEALS MADE BY ME TO MY STANDARDS.

PEOPLE COULD USE SOME LESSONS IN SIMPLE LIVING. THEY MAY GET THOSE LESSONS VERY SOON WHETHER THEY WANT THEM OR NOT.

I had a cell phone a couple of years ago and that was an extra one my brother had and let me use no charge. I used it as my primary phone for awhile(I did not talk much) mostly because our mother was in a nursing home and I was the one called . I no loner have it and do miss having it mainly for emergency contact when I am out at night for school. I do have cable (TV and internet) for my only primary source of entertainment and the computer for school. Since I do not spend money that I deem unneeded for me, I allow myself the cable. I do not go on vacations(I don't care for traveling much) and I do not have any kind of game system. Each person is different in their wants and needs and it's all good.

You all sound like a bunch of old fat ladies...Wal-Mart goers... always looking in the pile of never fashioned clothes and garage sales.

Get with the time people, technology is here to stay. How anyone uses it is a different story.

Dial-up, pleaseeeeee! I hated Dial-up since its first days, simply because the technology was never meant to carry data on the first place.

Get DSL or Cable for god sake. Web 2.0 is already here.

Even DSL light will be OK for the nickel & dime people.

I wish I could have more technology ( if I could afford it )

I read books, I go in Vacations, I only watch Discovery, Science channel, and the History channel. But you need cable for that...And HD is worth the upgrade. Nothing like watch the places you can not afford to go (for now) in 1080i  

I never play video games, because the low video resolution even on HD they still look very unrealistic to me. But I would definitely buy Microsoft Fly Simulator when video cards and computer power will be there to deliver almost real life experience.

Technology in every aspect is one of the greatest achievements of mankind. In despite of those times where its use is not so glorious or when it hurts our planet.

But, then again we use new technologies to find solutions create by old tecnologies.

All those great tireless minds that spent their entire life to make ours better doing research in new technologies are the real heroes to humanity. Because of them we can survive life everyday challenges; we can beat cancer and achieve more in life.

More respect to technology people, one day it might save your life, just the way it saved mine.

Well i think me and my hubby are pretty frugal. We rarely eat out, avoid the movie theatre, don't drink alcohol(which is a huge savings!), and limit buys based on wants rather than need, but I did stop to add up technology spending and i guess i didn't think about it as it seems so necessarry.  We spend 350-400/month on cable, internet, phone, cell phones, fax, and that does not include the added elctricity.  I think we are going to have to have a chat and see if we can trim a bit more.  We are shooting for retired by 50 and with some more trimming off the technology maybe we can do it early or at least have bettter retirement at 50.  

Im 26 yr and have been able to piece together a 130k retirement portfolio by living low tech and not trying to compete with the joneses. It seems everyone wants new $250 sneakers and designer clothes that work no better then my $45 dollar sneakers and jeans trying to impress other people. Who cares what other people think... most are in debt up to their eyeballs trying to impress people they dont know.

I do spurgle on somethings like books and I have my button down shirts tailored but only because off the rack doesnt fit me as I am tall with long arms.

I have set my financial goals to have 250K in investments by age 30 and am on track to beat that currently.

     Everyone has their own budgets and has to decide where to put their hard earned money. I admit, I do like tech, to an extent. I have a cell, with the minimum plan, but I don't text. I still do not have a big/ widescreen tv, seeing how the economy is going I'd rather have the $2000 in savings. Will I get one eventually? Yes.

    I believe in everything in moderation. I pay my-futureself first, meaning 401k, investments, and savings, then I pay my-present self.

    I mean what do I truly need in life, if you want to be extreme, I need a place to sleep, food, water, and clothing. Everything else is a want not a need.

    I do not have any credit card debt, and it will stay that way. But I will still "waste" money on things that I could do without, but choose not to.

Hmm...somebody praising the low tech lifestyle on an internet blog.  Kind of ironic, isn't it?

A reminder: I didn't say you SHOULDN'T use technology. I simply suggested thinking about how we use it and why.

No one is saying that technology is inherently bad. I'm using it right now, in fact.

Thanks for reading.

When I read this article "the low-tech life..." I immediately began to think - living with pre-1980s technology.

Nope.

Switching from a "cell phone" to a "pre-paid phone"?!!!!  That's like switching from a cordless phone to a corded phone, it's not much different.

Not using cable TV or a phone, but using Skype/Internet access???  What's "low-tech" about that???

Phlueeze.  This isn't even about living low-tech.  It's about making a calculated choice not to have one "high-tech" pleasure, but instead replacing it with something else (usually the Internet) that still requires a $1,000 computer and a $40+ per month broadband Internet account.  I'd at least believe the article if their ONLY Internet access was the occassional (i.e. once a week or less) use of a public computer at a public library or school, the only phone was a corded landline phone with basic (local) service only without long distance, either no TV or at least off-the-air TV only (no cable TV), and using newspapers and magazines for reading up on current events.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):