Search Smart Spending:

Turkey dinner for just $189 a plate

Posted Nov 09 2007, 12:25 PM by Donna Freedman
Rating:

The turkey ads showed up in my mailbox the other day. This week I can get a gobbler for 39 to 79 cents a pound, or even for free if I were to spend $100 at one store.

Compare that with the $4.99-a-pound cost for the "heritage" (exotic breed) turkeys featured in a recent article in Pacific Northwest, the Seattle Times Sunday magazine.

Author Lynda V. Mapes described supermarket turkeys as having "cottony meat" and as being "so blanderized by industrial-style production it can be like eating sawdust with butter."

The chef of a renowned regional restaurant orders the heirloom turkeys each year, Mapes wrote. "Not just any bird, after all, would do for his nine-course holiday dinner that goes for $189 per plate and up, including wine."

Last year's menu included a choice of poached white meat on king bolete mushroom bread pudding, confit of leg on mashed delicata squash with shallot, or herbed crépinette on cabbage with quince. Then there were the side dishes, like cauliflower fenugreek soup with slivered scallop, Montana paddlefish caviar on sea urchin flan, and "gently roasted" black cod with carrot lemon-thyme broth and three colors of beets.

I don't doubt that those high-end birds taste terrific. But I cook the cheapest turkey I can find each November, and have yet to encounter the flavor of either cotton or buttered sawdust.

Shrinking paychecks, social statements
I'm all for genetic diversity in both livestock and seeds, and definitely believe in the concept of family farms. (I grew up in a family-farm region.) But this article rubbed me the wrong way, and not just because I had to look up the word "crépinette."

What I inferred from the piece is that anyone with any brains/class would go for an heirloom bird, with or without the paddlefish caviar. They're yummy. They're part of sustainable agriculture. Their feathers are beautiful. What's not to like?

The fact is, many Americans have a hard time paying for regular groceries, let alone Thanksgiving feasts. The turkeys from the farm mentioned in the article average 8 to 13 pounds, or $39.92 to $64.87. At 39 cents per pound, the cost of supermarket gobblers in that size range is $3.12 to $5.07.

For some people, $39.92 is a week's worth of groceries. They don't have what Wal-Mart chief executive Lee Scott called "the economic luxury of making a broader social statement." Scott was referring to the fact that many people need to stretch their dollars as far as possible.

That goes for groceries as well as gewgaws. It's not that low- and middle-income people don't want to support family farms and sustainable agriculture. It's that they can't afford to do it. This week, eggs are a dollar a dozen at Albertsons and $2.99 a dozen at PCC Natural Markets. Which do you think a cash-strapped buyer will choose?

Incidentally, a crépinette is a small sausage wrapped in caul fat.

Shopping for a better world?
I think concepts like food co-ops and community-supported agriculture are swell ideas. But not everyone can pay the freight -- and some people can be a little sanctimonious about their own choices.

I personally know a couple who choose to buy mostly organic foods because they want their kids to have the healthiest possible start. To do this they must sacrifice in other ways. They don't make a big deal about it. They just do it.

Meanwhile, some of the people who rant about Wal-Mart and factory farms and diets for small planets do so from a position of privilege. They can afford to shop at specialty markets and sip shade-grown, fair-trade organic coffee because they have good jobs and/or don't have kids to feed and house.

I had this discussion with an old friend and fellow frugalist. He wondered about people who call for boycotts of big-box stores.  These people may be well-intentioned, but he believes they are not taking into account "the real needs of, say, a single parent on low wages desperately looking for the cheapest diapers she can find."

Anyone who knows me knows that I'm all about intentional buying. To me, that means being realistic about the money you have. A minimum-wage earner probably doesn't shop for a better world: "Are these carrots organic? Is this chicken free-range?" He or she is more likely to be in the position of, "I've got $30 left until payday. How am I going to eat?"

That's why people shop at Wal-Mart, and why people buy the cheapest turkeys they can find: because it's what they can afford.

To paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald, the rich are different -- they can afford Thanksgiving dinner that costs $189 a plate and up. Including wine.

Comments

 

What a sickening story while so many in this country go to bed hungry every night. My family is blessed with a home, income and health.  And we stopped years ago with expensive holiday gifts and always enjoy our "supermarket" turkey just fine...and the leftovers as well.  Instead of worrying about a designer turkey or ridiculous side dishes, maybe you should get on your knees, clasp hands and focus on the true meaning of Thanksgiving. An article like this sends such a terrible message to future generations..."It's all about me and excess and the heck with everyone else". Shame on you.  I can afford it, but I would choke on a $189 dinner. I'd rather open my home to those who are alone or serving this country. If you have that kind of money to throw away, why not look into World Vision, Heifer Project, Doctors Without Borders, Second Harvest, stc.  So many hungry people could be fed for $189 a plate! For the record, I am also a sophisticated and fairly accomplished cook and have a wide ranging palate.  That menu for $189 sounds disgusting.

I have to agree with those that have said that they think that is an astronomical price, but also we are a free country that will allow them to do that.  But to the one that made the comment about the "trailer park" people needs to re-evaluate his or her thinking.  I have a college degree and work 40+ hours per week and bring home the only income in our family.  I live in a mobile home that is only about 1 year old and PAID FOR.  That is a decision that my husband and I made together.  There are not too many daycares/babysitters that we would trust, so he is staying at home with our child.  No, we don't have a lot of money, but we are rich in love, peace, joy and true happiness.  We do have the ocassional argument, but then again, we are human.  And yes, I do sometimes buy junk food for us to eat, especially if my 4 year old askd for it (if I have the money).  But here is the thing, if he is given the choice, he would much rather have real food than junk (ex...he would eat tomatoes and rice before he would eat a piece of cake).  I know of some people who have trained as Special Agents for the Border Patrols, etc, and I have offered to make a Thanksgiving meal for them, but they had other plans, so they thanked me and went out to eat.

People have to follow their own conscience about how they spend their money... if they can afford that more power to them.  As the Apostle Paul said in the Bible, "I have learned in all things wherewith to be content."  As long as your family is healthy and happy, and you are trying to keep things up and working hard to pay bills, etc, why not enjoy what you have?

i would buy the $189 dinner.  If you can do it why not?  It's my money I do what I want.

I have been on both ends of the money scale. When my first husband left me with three kids (two of which were teenage boys over 6' tall), Wal-mart, panckakes and dried beans saved us. Things are much better now. I did not expect the wealthy to share with me, nor did I condem them for enjoying a $189 plate of food. It is their money to spend as they please, and I am sure the workers who prepare and serve that meal are very thankful that they purchase that meal so they can spend their paycheck at walmart.

responce to jim webb,  It is much more inexpensive for a contract food company to throw away tons of food than to have one law suit for a food borne illness.  Unfortanly some insurance companies will not alow food companies/restaurants/conventions to give away left overs.  Because some where along the way somebody was looking for a payday and sued because they got sick on free food.  And how many lawyers  would turn down the chance to represent 140 underprivliged that got sick from left over food, regardless of who didn't reheat  the turkey stuffing to 165.

Ms. Freedman plainly missed what the article was about.  It did not suggest that everyone should get one of these turkeys (not possible given their limited number) nor did it imply that those who did not were not up to snuff.  It was about how we live in a world where the numbers demand leads to a massive 'sameness' as the norm and that sameness leads to mediocrity.  I will be having one of the 'cheaper' turkeys but I know that any flavor it has will come from how it is prepared rather than the meat itself.  I guess writing about how there are still people that try to get away from this medicocrity is an indictment of the writer as a snob and an elitist.   By the way, the pictures of the farm where the turkeys are raised did not exactly look like a palace either.  The turkey farming family would seem to be one of the lucky ones that enjoy what they are doing for a living while being satisfied to make enough to get by knowing they will never be rich.  It does not seem elitist to me.  It must be me who does not 'get it'.

If the $189.00 a plate dinner would also provide a donation to a local food bank or shelter then if you can afford it, enjoy. Please try to remember that there are alot of people that need help and would enjoy a hot meal.

Article is interesting not so much becasue of what it says...but because of what it suggests.  This rhetoric possibly could be classified "as pre-depression expression"  Once again, we are hearing how hard the middle and lower classes are faring in our economy. Take heed upper class...the masses will not continue to eat bread instead of Turkey...even if it is stuffing!  

Betsy, I do not want to pay for your 27 years old "child" to have health insurance. He/She should be working and paying for their own insurance. That said, I really appreciate the article and how is shows understanding for the average person who WORKS, Betsy, and must make the best or their financial situation.

Great story.. Makes you think about the holiday in a different way. Thanks

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):