Search Smart Spending:

Turkey dinner for just $189 a plate

Posted Nov 09 2007, 12:25 PM by Donna Freedman
Rating:

The turkey ads showed up in my mailbox the other day. This week I can get a gobbler for 39 to 79 cents a pound, or even for free if I were to spend $100 at one store.

Compare that with the $4.99-a-pound cost for the "heritage" (exotic breed) turkeys featured in a recent article in Pacific Northwest, the Seattle Times Sunday magazine.

Author Lynda V. Mapes described supermarket turkeys as having "cottony meat" and as being "so blanderized by industrial-style production it can be like eating sawdust with butter."

The chef of a renowned regional restaurant orders the heirloom turkeys each year, Mapes wrote. "Not just any bird, after all, would do for his nine-course holiday dinner that goes for $189 per plate and up, including wine."

Last year's menu included a choice of poached white meat on king bolete mushroom bread pudding, confit of leg on mashed delicata squash with shallot, or herbed crépinette on cabbage with quince. Then there were the side dishes, like cauliflower fenugreek soup with slivered scallop, Montana paddlefish caviar on sea urchin flan, and "gently roasted" black cod with carrot lemon-thyme broth and three colors of beets.

I don't doubt that those high-end birds taste terrific. But I cook the cheapest turkey I can find each November, and have yet to encounter the flavor of either cotton or buttered sawdust.

Shrinking paychecks, social statements
I'm all for genetic diversity in both livestock and seeds, and definitely believe in the concept of family farms. (I grew up in a family-farm region.) But this article rubbed me the wrong way, and not just because I had to look up the word "crépinette."

What I inferred from the piece is that anyone with any brains/class would go for an heirloom bird, with or without the paddlefish caviar. They're yummy. They're part of sustainable agriculture. Their feathers are beautiful. What's not to like?

The fact is, many Americans have a hard time paying for regular groceries, let alone Thanksgiving feasts. The turkeys from the farm mentioned in the article average 8 to 13 pounds, or $39.92 to $64.87. At 39 cents per pound, the cost of supermarket gobblers in that size range is $3.12 to $5.07.

For some people, $39.92 is a week's worth of groceries. They don't have what Wal-Mart chief executive Lee Scott called "the economic luxury of making a broader social statement." Scott was referring to the fact that many people need to stretch their dollars as far as possible.

That goes for groceries as well as gewgaws. It's not that low- and middle-income people don't want to support family farms and sustainable agriculture. It's that they can't afford to do it. This week, eggs are a dollar a dozen at Albertsons and $2.99 a dozen at PCC Natural Markets. Which do you think a cash-strapped buyer will choose?

Incidentally, a crépinette is a small sausage wrapped in caul fat.

Shopping for a better world?
I think concepts like food co-ops and community-supported agriculture are swell ideas. But not everyone can pay the freight -- and some people can be a little sanctimonious about their own choices.

I personally know a couple who choose to buy mostly organic foods because they want their kids to have the healthiest possible start. To do this they must sacrifice in other ways. They don't make a big deal about it. They just do it.

Meanwhile, some of the people who rant about Wal-Mart and factory farms and diets for small planets do so from a position of privilege. They can afford to shop at specialty markets and sip shade-grown, fair-trade organic coffee because they have good jobs and/or don't have kids to feed and house.

I had this discussion with an old friend and fellow frugalist. He wondered about people who call for boycotts of big-box stores.  These people may be well-intentioned, but he believes they are not taking into account "the real needs of, say, a single parent on low wages desperately looking for the cheapest diapers she can find."

Anyone who knows me knows that I'm all about intentional buying. To me, that means being realistic about the money you have. A minimum-wage earner probably doesn't shop for a better world: "Are these carrots organic? Is this chicken free-range?" He or she is more likely to be in the position of, "I've got $30 left until payday. How am I going to eat?"

That's why people shop at Wal-Mart, and why people buy the cheapest turkeys they can find: because it's what they can afford.

To paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald, the rich are different -- they can afford Thanksgiving dinner that costs $189 a plate and up. Including wine.

Comments

 

Dave...u must come from Amman, Jordan lol......right?

I volunteer with the St. Vincent de Paul Society. We are currently working to get enough food to provide the poor families of our community (Grand Prairie, Texas) with food for Thanksgiving. We pay full price for the food we acquire to give to our poor families. It still requires an awful lot of hard work and frustration trying to accumulate the necessary amount of: meat, vegetables, etc. to give the needy the holiday "feast."  The "Gee, you're too late" or "we have a limit of # on that item" is enough to drive the well-intended crazy. We won't stop trying, but a little cooperation from the good Christian merchants of this community would surely help!

 i can't imagine spending 189.00 per plate for a turkey dinner.while the meat is probably better tasting and more healthy the fact is most people can't afford to spend that kind of money for a meal.i'll bet even the very rich hesitate when confronted with an idea like this.

 TOTALLY STUPID.that's what it is.

I was pleased to see the realistic voice given to us single mothers in this article. That is greatly lacking in many of MSN's money articles. The statement that "I have $30 until payday. What are we going to eat?" Is one I've made to myself many times.

I think the readers are missing the point.  A restaurant owner/chef can whatever they want and if you choose to go eat there, you know ahead of time what it will cost you.  If you can't afford the $189 plate, don't go eat there.  

i agree that each of us has the right to spend our money the way we choose and the fact is some can spend a lot more than others.... and they should not be criticized.  However, i do agree with the author's reference to the fact those that do have the means to spend more on "organic" and "all natural" food and such should not criticize those that simply can't afford to do so.  Movie stars and other privileged individuals will stand in the pulpit and preach how we need to conserve energy by buying hybrid cars and heating with solar panels, or support local farmers by shopping at co-ops, etc.   Well, yeah, I'd love to do my part, but i honestly can't afford these things.

Quoted: "considering the fact that those wal mart people are buying ho-hos and ding dongs for their kids in the trailor while they work 35-40 hrs a week, i don't feel that bad for them."

Ooookay.  Sure, right, yep, *every* low-income family *must* live in a trailer.  Thank you for perpetuating yet another negative stereotype.  My family and  I live in a four-bedroom, rather nice apartment, rent-controlled (which is the only way we can afford it, btw).  We shop at Wal-Mart, but there are no "ho-hos" and "ding dongs" coming into my house.  That stuff is crap, and it isn't cheap.  This is not about who has a "refined palate".  This is not about "having a good time".  This is about EXTRAVAGANCE.  

We've been married 51 years and my wife has prepared Thanksgiving dinner each year except for three times.  The first year I was away in the military,  the next time we were enroute to our grand-daughter's early surprise birth event,  and lastly we chose to go to an advertised dinner at a large hotel's resturaunt.  During all these years our family and friends would seldom miss an invitation to my wife's Thanksgiving dinner,  and they didn't come because of my charming personality,  they came because of my wife's delicious meals.  We have always been cost conscious,  and careful to buy our turkey during special holiday promotions,  and never have I experienced a taste that was anything like "cotton" or "sawdust",  even though my wife was raised on a southeast Alabama cotton farm.  Then too,  I did own a camper and motor home manufacturing firm for many years,  so I'm pretty much expert in all matters sawdust.  The only edgy meal I remember was the year that we dined at the big hotel.  We have a society of rich lazy people in this country, who have accended the economic ladder through manipulation,  instead of real personal effort,  taking stockholders and investors to the cleaners, then walking away with obcene fortunes.  As long as those conditions exist,  we will always have those people trying to surplant the notion that the hard workers of the country are less than intellegent.  I could, in fact,  pay the $189.00 per plate,  and it wouldn't break us or cause a particular hardship,  but you know what,  we bought two bargain priced turkeys at Wal-Mart last week,  and I put a few extra bucks in the pot of the bell ringer who was standing outside the door.  Oh yes,  we expect a housefull again this year.   I guess they have all grown accustomed and tolerant of "cotton".

It would appear to me to be poor stewardship over your finances, regardless of

how affluent you are, to spend $189 on a Thanksgiving meal.  Donating that amount

to a charity that is serving Thanksgiving meals would probably feed 60 - 90 people

who otherwise might not have a thanksgiving meal of any kind.  Think about it.

It is high time for the age of "conspicuous comsumption" to end.

When did we start using the words (albiet and surreal)????   I never used them when I was growing up and now those two words seem to be in style.  Along with the phrase "Having said that.....or That being said"  Not that this has anything to do with the article....just something that came to mind.

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):