Search Smart Spending:

Turkey dinner for just $189 a plate

Posted Nov 09 2007, 12:25 PM by Donna Freedman
Rating:

The turkey ads showed up in my mailbox the other day. This week I can get a gobbler for 39 to 79 cents a pound, or even for free if I were to spend $100 at one store.

Compare that with the $4.99-a-pound cost for the "heritage" (exotic breed) turkeys featured in a recent article in Pacific Northwest, the Seattle Times Sunday magazine.

Author Lynda V. Mapes described supermarket turkeys as having "cottony meat" and as being "so blanderized by industrial-style production it can be like eating sawdust with butter."

The chef of a renowned regional restaurant orders the heirloom turkeys each year, Mapes wrote. "Not just any bird, after all, would do for his nine-course holiday dinner that goes for $189 per plate and up, including wine."

Last year's menu included a choice of poached white meat on king bolete mushroom bread pudding, confit of leg on mashed delicata squash with shallot, or herbed crépinette on cabbage with quince. Then there were the side dishes, like cauliflower fenugreek soup with slivered scallop, Montana paddlefish caviar on sea urchin flan, and "gently roasted" black cod with carrot lemon-thyme broth and three colors of beets.

I don't doubt that those high-end birds taste terrific. But I cook the cheapest turkey I can find each November, and have yet to encounter the flavor of either cotton or buttered sawdust.

Shrinking paychecks, social statements
I'm all for genetic diversity in both livestock and seeds, and definitely believe in the concept of family farms. (I grew up in a family-farm region.) But this article rubbed me the wrong way, and not just because I had to look up the word "crépinette."

What I inferred from the piece is that anyone with any brains/class would go for an heirloom bird, with or without the paddlefish caviar. They're yummy. They're part of sustainable agriculture. Their feathers are beautiful. What's not to like?

The fact is, many Americans have a hard time paying for regular groceries, let alone Thanksgiving feasts. The turkeys from the farm mentioned in the article average 8 to 13 pounds, or $39.92 to $64.87. At 39 cents per pound, the cost of supermarket gobblers in that size range is $3.12 to $5.07.

For some people, $39.92 is a week's worth of groceries. They don't have what Wal-Mart chief executive Lee Scott called "the economic luxury of making a broader social statement." Scott was referring to the fact that many people need to stretch their dollars as far as possible.

That goes for groceries as well as gewgaws. It's not that low- and middle-income people don't want to support family farms and sustainable agriculture. It's that they can't afford to do it. This week, eggs are a dollar a dozen at Albertsons and $2.99 a dozen at PCC Natural Markets. Which do you think a cash-strapped buyer will choose?

Incidentally, a crépinette is a small sausage wrapped in caul fat.

Shopping for a better world?
I think concepts like food co-ops and community-supported agriculture are swell ideas. But not everyone can pay the freight -- and some people can be a little sanctimonious about their own choices.

I personally know a couple who choose to buy mostly organic foods because they want their kids to have the healthiest possible start. To do this they must sacrifice in other ways. They don't make a big deal about it. They just do it.

Meanwhile, some of the people who rant about Wal-Mart and factory farms and diets for small planets do so from a position of privilege. They can afford to shop at specialty markets and sip shade-grown, fair-trade organic coffee because they have good jobs and/or don't have kids to feed and house.

I had this discussion with an old friend and fellow frugalist. He wondered about people who call for boycotts of big-box stores.  These people may be well-intentioned, but he believes they are not taking into account "the real needs of, say, a single parent on low wages desperately looking for the cheapest diapers she can find."

Anyone who knows me knows that I'm all about intentional buying. To me, that means being realistic about the money you have. A minimum-wage earner probably doesn't shop for a better world: "Are these carrots organic? Is this chicken free-range?" He or she is more likely to be in the position of, "I've got $30 left until payday. How am I going to eat?"

That's why people shop at Wal-Mart, and why people buy the cheapest turkeys they can find: because it's what they can afford.

To paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald, the rich are different -- they can afford Thanksgiving dinner that costs $189 a plate and up. Including wine.

 

Comments

 

I'd rather give the $189 (that I don't have) to a homeless shelter!

Aside from being an economical cook, I am frugal.  For us, it's not just about the meal, but also the leftovers (which will make meals thereafter), broth and soup.  The cost of the turkey turns in an even better return on investment when it's completely used.  I wonder how much of each bird is being discarded after the choice parts are used in that expensive meal?

There is no proof that those heirloom turkeys and the methods used to raise them are better on the environment than commercial farming methods.  And there is no proof that they are any "safer" either.  As counter-establishment or counter-market as these purists want to be, in the end -- it's all about marketing and making a profit.

This time of year is great not only for buying the "big bird," but for getting a great price on turkey thighs -- a great basis for a delicious and affordable meal that can be made in about 40 minutes any week night!

The best cafeteria in town features a roast turkey dinner to feed 12 people for  $142 and that is somewhat higher than the "Big Box" stores offering. Whowants poached turkey anyway?

I'll be buying my turkey from Sam's, but I also do drink Fair Trade Organic Coffee (albiet from Trader Joe's).  Why belittle me if I can afford an occasional luxury?  I don't belittle people that can't and try to share my good fortune when I can.

Awesome article.  You really seem to understand the average american buyer.  Thanks for the insight.

A cook who cares can make the cheapest cuts of  meat taste like filet mignon. I learned this young and have brought it with me in life, and it's always proven true. ANd no mtter what the budget, we've eaten pretty darn good, and so have those who've cared for us too. Nothing goes to waste and all is enjoyed. "Designer" foods and such is what you make of them, and as most have learned, the most expensive, exclusive or eccentric doesn't always taste that way. Go for what suits your own packetbook and put the Love you have for your-own families & friends into the meal, and it will taste like it - delicious!

$189. per plate is disgusting.  There are so many people/charities who could benefit so much from the selfishness and extravagances of the rich if the rich only would SHARE.

This reminds me of the cost of the war in Iraq, which would pay medical insurance for EVERY child in this country until they are 27 years old.

Such wasteful and selfish ways for some to spend their money when there are so many in need.  It's disgraceful.

A (snobbish) fool and his money are soon parted.

I have seenfood that has not been touched or eaten just thrown into trashbins and carried to the dump.  I asked the people doing this why not give this to the homeless in the parking lot across the street. Their reply was we can not because the health department willl not let us.  This all happened at the political convention in Atlanta, Ga. in the 80's.  I was working there and I saw it with my own eyes.  The next time your near a Democrat or Republican convention check to see what they do with the food that has not been eaten or touched. They usuallly start around 11:00 or 12:00 PM at night. Be there and see for yourself.  They throw out enough to feed hundreds of people.

Where I  live (now in the USA) the $189.00 can purchase Thnanksgiving dinner for 5 (five)  family with 8 (eight) person in each family. The country where I came from the $189.00 can feed a family of 10 for a month.

I think the writer missed the point of the article, I don't have children, sometimes I make a good living, but I am a good cook and always enough for work the next day.  This article was about arrogance for those who can't or won't pay this kind of money.  It says nothing about good taste, just how to waste money on bad taste.  Besides, with all of the organic, heatlh foods, etc. Linda McCarthy died in her 50s and she didn't particularly looked healthy, while Hal Roach and George Burns smoked cigars heavily up until the time they both died at age 100.  It's in the genetic makeup, and food and what a person pays for it has to do with priorities -- I'd rather buy my lottery tickets rather than waste it on "overpriced" food and drink that is going to end up in the sewer like any other "regular" or "frugal" priced food and drink!

Send a Comment

Comments must be directly related to the blog entry. Comments with offensive language will be deleted. Your e-mail address won't be displayed.

(please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):